My attitude to AI of the ChatGPT type, firstly that this is artificial intelligence, and as such in several areas (creativity, sensitivity, emotions, etc) subordinate to human intelligence. But secondly, AI is here to stay, and it will develop enormously. The latter should perhaps give cause for concern.

I see the answer AI gave in this case as useful in that it is a list of important things that we mostly know and are aware of. The answer can e.g. be used by politicians and socially engaged people in the individual country who wish to design a sustainable policy, or check that such a policy is in place in the country. In this sense, this type of AI can be a kind of targeted extension of search engines like Google and Bing.

If we want to go deeper into the topic with the help of AI, we will probably have to ask many follow-up questions and steer the AI bot where we want. But for this purpose, I think human intelligence is better than AI. I can e.g. sharpen the focus towards specific human needs, emotions and feelings, basic and special human experiences and needs. Here, human intelligence will probably often be superior to AI, but here it naturally depends on this particular person's qualifications, knowledge and insights, emotional and fact-based intelligence, etc.

My conclusion: Human intelligence is superior to artificial intelligence